We use cookies to ensure our site functions properly and to store limited information about your usage. You may give or withdraw consent at any time. To find out more, read our privacy policy and cookie policy.
Manage Cookies
A cookie is information stored on your computer by a website you visit. Cookies often store your settings for a website, such as your preferred language or location. This allows the site to present you with information customized to fit your needs. As per the GDPR law, companies need to get your explicit approval to collect your data. Some of these cookies are ‘strictly necessary’ to provide the basic functions of the website and can not be turned off, while others if present, have the option of being turned off. Learn more about our Privacy and Cookie policies. These can be managed also from our cookie policy page.
Strictly necessary cookies(always on):
Necessary for enabling core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies. This cannot be turned off. e.g. Sign in, Language
Analytics cookies:
Analytical cookies help us to analyse user behaviour, mainly to see if the users are able to find and act on things that they are looking for. They allow us to recognise and count the number of visitors and to see how visitors move around our website when they are using it. Tools used: Google Analytics
Share Single Transferable Vote Consultation on FacebookShare Single Transferable Vote Consultation on TwitterShare Single Transferable Vote Consultation on LinkedinEmail Single Transferable Vote Consultation link
This consultation has now closed.
Local County Council elections in Wales use the first-past-the-post system. Here in Powys, we are looking into the possibility of moving to the Single Transferable Vote system and changing the way you vote in our local County Council elections.
In order for us to consider the change we would like to know what you think.
Our Councillors will then use this information to decide whether or not to adopt the Single Transferable Vote system for our local elections, from 2027 onwards, by the deadline set out by Welsh Government of 15 November 2024.
The first-past-the-post system
In most areas of Wales, we use the first-past-the-post system to elect local Councillors, who look after issues specific to your local area.
How do people vote?
When you vote in an election which uses first-past-the-post, you are given one ballot paper.
The instructions on the ballot paper will tell you how many people you’re allowed to vote for. You may be able to vote for more than one person because more than one person will represent you, and you are asked to simply mark an X next to the name(s) of the candidate(s) you want to vote for.
How are candidates elected?
Once the votes are counted the candidate(s) with the most votes are elected.
The Single Transferable Vote system
In Wales, we can use a system called Single Transferable Vote (or STV) to elect local Councillors.No Council in Wales has moved to the STV system yet, but Gwynedd and Ceredigion County Councils are also considering the change.
The STV system is a form of proportional representation designed to allow voters more choice than just one candidate.
At the moment, most residents in Powys are used to having a single Councillor representing their ward, as only eight of our 60 wards currently have more than one Councillor.
If we were to introduce the STV system, we would still have 68 Councillors, but rather than one Councillor representing everyone in a ward, we would have bigger wards with between three and six Councillors representing each one.
The number of Councillors in each ward would be determined by Welsh Government with recommendations from the Democracy and Boundary Commission Cymru.
How does it work?
Please watch the video below from The Electoral Commission, explaining how the single transferable vote system works:
What are the Pros and Cons for Single Transferrable Vote system?
STV aims to achieve proportional representation. This means that parties or candidates receive seats in proportion to the number of votes they receive. This can lead to a more accurate reflection of the voters' preferences in the composition of the Council.
The ability to rank the candidates on your ballot paper means that your votes are more likely to contribute to the election of a candidate you support. Even if your first-choice candidate doesn't win, your vote can be transferred to your next choice. This reduces the number of wasted votes, where votes for losing candidates do not contribute to the election outcome.
STV encourages candidates to appeal to a broader range of voters as they will need to gather second and subsequent preference votes. This can foster cooperation and coalition building among different parties and candidates.
STV can also enhance the representation of smaller/minority groups.
STV provides voters with a greater choice of candidates within a party, allowing you to vote for individuals rather than just parties.
The STV system might be difficult to understand, which we could help by providing information and materials to voters.
The complexity of the STV system might put off some voters, leading to a feeling of disconnection from the electoral process if they do not fully understand how their votes are being counted.
There is the potential for an increase in spoilt ballot papers.
Multi Councillor wards may lead to bigger ballot papers, and the order candidates appear could be an issue if they are listed alphabetically rather than using a system which randomises the order, which may be expensive.
The more complex counting process will result in the count taking a minimum of two days and thereby doubling the cost of the count. Initial counts under an STV system could be longer as count staff get used to the new process.
The longer counting process can delay the announcement of election results compared to other voting systems.
Paper versions of this consultation and form are available todownload and print here(including Easy Read) or you can pick one up from libraries across Powys, please ask a member of staff for a copy.
The closing date to provide us with your feedback is Monday 30 September 2024.
This consultation has now closed.
Local County Council elections in Wales use the first-past-the-post system. Here in Powys, we are looking into the possibility of moving to the Single Transferable Vote system and changing the way you vote in our local County Council elections.
In order for us to consider the change we would like to know what you think.
Our Councillors will then use this information to decide whether or not to adopt the Single Transferable Vote system for our local elections, from 2027 onwards, by the deadline set out by Welsh Government of 15 November 2024.
The first-past-the-post system
In most areas of Wales, we use the first-past-the-post system to elect local Councillors, who look after issues specific to your local area.
How do people vote?
When you vote in an election which uses first-past-the-post, you are given one ballot paper.
The instructions on the ballot paper will tell you how many people you’re allowed to vote for. You may be able to vote for more than one person because more than one person will represent you, and you are asked to simply mark an X next to the name(s) of the candidate(s) you want to vote for.
How are candidates elected?
Once the votes are counted the candidate(s) with the most votes are elected.
The Single Transferable Vote system
In Wales, we can use a system called Single Transferable Vote (or STV) to elect local Councillors.No Council in Wales has moved to the STV system yet, but Gwynedd and Ceredigion County Councils are also considering the change.
The STV system is a form of proportional representation designed to allow voters more choice than just one candidate.
At the moment, most residents in Powys are used to having a single Councillor representing their ward, as only eight of our 60 wards currently have more than one Councillor.
If we were to introduce the STV system, we would still have 68 Councillors, but rather than one Councillor representing everyone in a ward, we would have bigger wards with between three and six Councillors representing each one.
The number of Councillors in each ward would be determined by Welsh Government with recommendations from the Democracy and Boundary Commission Cymru.
How does it work?
Please watch the video below from The Electoral Commission, explaining how the single transferable vote system works:
What are the Pros and Cons for Single Transferrable Vote system?
STV aims to achieve proportional representation. This means that parties or candidates receive seats in proportion to the number of votes they receive. This can lead to a more accurate reflection of the voters' preferences in the composition of the Council.
The ability to rank the candidates on your ballot paper means that your votes are more likely to contribute to the election of a candidate you support. Even if your first-choice candidate doesn't win, your vote can be transferred to your next choice. This reduces the number of wasted votes, where votes for losing candidates do not contribute to the election outcome.
STV encourages candidates to appeal to a broader range of voters as they will need to gather second and subsequent preference votes. This can foster cooperation and coalition building among different parties and candidates.
STV can also enhance the representation of smaller/minority groups.
STV provides voters with a greater choice of candidates within a party, allowing you to vote for individuals rather than just parties.
The STV system might be difficult to understand, which we could help by providing information and materials to voters.
The complexity of the STV system might put off some voters, leading to a feeling of disconnection from the electoral process if they do not fully understand how their votes are being counted.
There is the potential for an increase in spoilt ballot papers.
Multi Councillor wards may lead to bigger ballot papers, and the order candidates appear could be an issue if they are listed alphabetically rather than using a system which randomises the order, which may be expensive.
The more complex counting process will result in the count taking a minimum of two days and thereby doubling the cost of the count. Initial counts under an STV system could be longer as count staff get used to the new process.
The longer counting process can delay the announcement of election results compared to other voting systems.
Paper versions of this consultation and form are available todownload and print here(including Easy Read) or you can pick one up from libraries across Powys, please ask a member of staff for a copy.
The closing date to provide us with your feedback is Monday 30 September 2024.
Share Latest News on FacebookShare Latest News on TwitterShare Latest News on LinkedinEmail Latest News link
How many people responded to the engagement?
1,270
How many people visited this project?
2,805
What is the latest news?
Single Transferable Vote system rejected
The move to a Single Transferable Vote system and a change to the way people vote in local Powys County Council elections, has been rejected.
During a public consultation held between 12th August and 30th September, 60.5% of the 1270 respondents supported adopting the STV system for future local county council elections, with 27.6% preferring the current first-past-the-post system.
In order for the change to be approved by full council, at least a 2/3 majority (46 out of 68 votes) was required. Following yesterday's debate (17th October), 21 out of 68 councillors voted in favour of the change, falling short of the number needed to move to the alternative voting system.
Cllr James Gibson-Watt, Leader and Cabinet Member for an Open and Transparent Powys, said: "Thank you to everyone who took part in the consultation, your feedback was an important part of our decision-making process.
"Following our full council debate on the matter, we have decided that as a council we are unable to move to the new voting system for our local County Council elections. The vote clearly showed that the majority of Councillors do not think it would be the right decision to change at this time."